Wednesday, December 7, 2011

Guest Lecture 6 - Fri Dec 9 - David Kjelkerud

.
Guest lecturer: David Kjelkerud, former KTH student and co-founder of Readmill
Title: How we built Readmill
Time: Friday December 9 at 10-12
Place: Lecture hall V3

Abstract:
David will talk about the lessons learned from having worked for a year on building Readmill - a social reading platform for communities of readers. David will discuss some of the challenges Readmill has faced when designing a niche social service around books - a medium and an activity that people mostly think of as solitary. David will also present a mixed bag of interface nerdery as well as reflections on social interaction design and hacker culture values, principles and practices. Finally David will explain why Apple in fact (still) is an 80's company.

Literature:
Please see Tessa's earlier blog post about the future of books as well as my comment/link to a 4-minute interview with David's partner and Readmill co-founder Henrik Berggren.

[Please take a moment to think about these issues. What do you imagine or expect David to talk about? Can you in advance think of a question you would like to pose? / Daniel]


About David:
David is a designer/engineer who has been schooled in Media Technology and HCI at KTH. After graduating, he worked as a researcher and freelancer for agencies and big companies. When he got tired of that, he moved to Berlin and started his own company in order to build the future of connected books.
.

Monday, December 5, 2011

Hanging up your posters and presenting them

.
Hanging up your posters
-----------------------------
I talked to the printshop this morning. They had received 9 pdf documents. There was a problem with one but I talked to a group member who said he would fix it.

Miyabi will pick up all the posters tomorrow. She will put them somewhere in "Torget" (house D, top floor) before lunch (12.00 at the latest). Each group will have to go there and hang their own poster up. Do feel free to move around the screens where you will hang the posters - please have in mind that 50 persons will move around in the room and look at them!

Poster session
-----------------
Based on some feedback from last year, this is how we'll do it this time around.

- We walk around the room and listen to each group shortly present their poster (3-4 minutes per group).
- We have some "free time" to move around and have a second look at posters (and time to ask questions too).
- We finish we a short summing-up
.

Friday, December 2, 2011

Important info about your posters (some additional info)

.
I have talked to the printshop. They:
1) need your posters by Sunday (late is ok) and
2) will start to work on them first thing in the morning on Monday and
3) Miyabi will pick them up on Tuesday before lunch.

There is thus no margin of error and you have to send them exactly what they need/ask for. So, I called them and these are the top three things you need to think about:

1) You have to send a pdf document (no other format will do!).

2) The resolution should be at least 150 dpi for it to look good when they print it (higher is ok, lower is not so ok - they will print it but it will have effects on the quality of the end product!).

3) The size of the poster is 70*100 and you should aim for that and nothing else! They don't have time to fix things if you send them a document with other proportions!

NOTE: Two groups have already sent posters; Leonore's was fine, but Charles' had the wrong proportions (420*594) and was returned!


- Note: Special fonts must be included in the file - they might exist in your computer but the printer might not have them.


Here is a repetition of some info from the previous blog post:

- Send your file to klasse(at)vittgrafiska.se on Sunday at the latest. It is important that they have all the posters when they get to their jobs on Monday morning.

- IMPORTANT: write "KTH" in the subject line of your e-mail!
.

Thursday, December 1, 2011

Welcome to the future!

.

You are all cordially invited to attend the final presentation in the 5th year/2nd year masters' students project course Future of Media Friday December 9 from 13.00-16.00 in lecture hall F2.

This year's theme for the course is "Future of Radio/Radio of the Future" and the students have worked with this course and the theme during the whole autumn. No less that 11 project groups will report on their results in the form of 10-minute long presentations that often include multimedia support (movies, radio, screen shots of prototypes etc.).

Almost all of you will take the course "DM2571 Future of Media" next year. Earlier themes have been for example "Future of the Book", "Future of TV", "Future of Computer games" and "Future of Music".

More information is available at this website. Do note that all younger students in the (Swedish-language) Media Technology Program have to come to this presentation. The lecture hall F2 (238 seats) might become full, so please register for the event (at the bottom of the page) and come early to make sure you get good seats!

Why should you go?
1) You will take the course yourselves next year and listening to the final presentations is the very best information about the course and what will be expected of you next year.
2) Around 10 of your classmates in this course have worked with the Future of Radio/Radio of the Future - go see what they have to present!
3) A lot of work has been put into these presentations. Watching them live for sure beats sitting home checking out YouTube videos posted to socialmediatechnologies.blogspot.com/!
4) This is the closest thing to an end-of-the-year ceremony that we have. Do take the opportunity to go to the presentations together - and perhaps continue somewhere else for a final get-together with your classmates over a beer afterwards? (I'll come too if someone posts info about time and place.)

Welcome!

Daniel Pargman & Åke Walldius
.

Seminar assignment 7 (deadline Dec 4)

.
Sorry for this assignment being slightly late. I had some pretty serious deadlines in my other course which required all my time in the weekend and the beginning of this week.


Seminar assignment 7 is the last assignment. We have chosen to "kidnap" the assignment and have it partly tie back to Pernilla's guest lecture about using social media in higher education.

Each assignment can be regarded as an exam question that will be graded separately. Do note that we will have no final exam or home exam in the course, but this assignment is in fact based on two of the questions in last year's home exam.

Right now, you can find the following documents in Bilda (Documents/Seminar assignments):
- The seminar 7 assignment (instructions)
- The seminar 7 assignment template - download and use it when you write your assignment - DO NOTE that this is a new template that you have to use for this assignment!
.

Wednesday, November 30, 2011

Guest Lecture 5 - Fri Dec 2 - Therese Reuterswärd

.
Guest lecturer: Therese Reuterswärd, Online Market Manager at Scandic Hotels
Title: Relationship marketing through social media
Time: Friday December 2 at 10-12
Place: Lecture hall K2

Abstract:
Therese's presentation will emphasize what the shift from broadcast media to social media actually means for businesses. She will show examples of relationship marketing in daily work and talk about the types of challenges you will face when trying to make it all come together and put it all into action.

Additionally, Therese will touch on the tools and techniques behind it all; Klout score, Facebook Edgerank, Google+ and social shopping.

Some of the challenges Therese experienced last year (at last year's lecture in the course which was givet at a time when she worked for Electrolux) are summed up here [partly in Swedish and partly in English]. Therese welcomes feedback on her presentation-in-the-making (http://prezi.com/brkhgclm4kf0/relationship-marketing-through-social-media/) and through twitter (@TrulyTherese).

[Please take a moment to think about these issues. What do you imagine or expect Therese to talk about? Can you in advance think of a question you would like to pose? / Daniel]


About Therese:
Therese graduated from KTH Media Technology in 2006. Her task at Scandic Hotels is to create strategies for generating traffic, converting it to business and at the same time maximize retention via online channels. Therese's focus is to, at every digital touchpoint, adapt timing, placement and marketing content to fit consumers' behaviors and needs. Specifically, Therese is responsible for e-commerce, web analytics, search engine marketing, PPC advertising, affiliates, digital partners, email marketing and (occasionally) social media.
.

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Important info about your posters

.
Thanks to a student in our class who studies the print specialization, we now have a deal with a nearby printshop to print your posters. This is an option - you can do it but you of course don't have to do. KTH/this course will pay for the printing costs.


The printshop is called Vitt Grafiska. These are the steps for having them print your poster:

- Send a pdf file to klasse(at)vittgrafiska.se on Sunday. It is important that they have all the posters when they get to their jobs on Monday morning.

- IMPORTANT: write "KTH" in the subject line of your e-mail!

- You need to have at least 150 dpi resolution for it to look good when it is printed.

- You can pick up your posters at Karlavägen 104 on Tuesday morning. The printshop is 2 kilometers away from KTH, you can walk there or go there by bus/subway.


If you have any further questions, please pose them here in the form of a comment to this blog post. I will then call Klasse at Vitt grafiska later this week and post the answers here!
.

Monday, November 28, 2011

Readings for lecture 6 - Journalism and sustainability

.
The topic of this weeks lecture is journalism/citizen media and sustainability. I wanted to do sustainability last week, but we had some logistical problems with the equipment and time ran out. So this lecture is based on two different "packages":

Package 1 (was topic 4 last week): Perhaps most provocative of all questions; is the Internet/social media sustainable in the long run? Will we face challenges during the 21st century (climate change, energy and resource depletion issues) that will force us to radically rethink our habits and our use of technology? These short texts point out some radically different possibilities for the future of cheap electricity and for the Internet/social media.

- Bardi (2009). "The spike and the peak" (pdf file). Posted to online discussion forum "The Oil Drum" - 4 pages.
- Pargman (2010). "Ubiquitous information in a world of limitations" (available in Bilda/Documents/Papers). Presented at a 2010 workshop on "The culture of ubiquitous information". - 16 pages.
- Greer (2009). "The end of the information age" and "The economics of decline" (printer-friendly version). Published at Energy Bulletin - 3 pages each.

Comments: My text above is also the basis for a proposed master's thesis topic, "ICT use in the post-modern city". Greer's texts draws on his 2008 book "The long descent: A user's guide to the end of the industrial age". Greer makes a passing remark to the short 1909 story "The machine stops" by the author E.M. Forster (more well-know for "A room with a view" and "Howard's end"). You might consider reading a little fiction in you get tired of all the fact-filled texts above...


Package 2:
- Benkler, "The trouble with mass media" (chapter 6) - 35 pages
- Fallows, "How to save the news". The Atlantic, June 2010. - 12 pages (in the original print magazine)
- Gillmor (2006), "We are all reporters now" (BBC News) - 3 pages
- Gillmor (2006), "Introduction" from his book "We the media: Grassroots journalism by the people, for the people" - 11 pages, available in Bilda/Documents

26 + 61 = 89 pages
.

Late assignments grading

.
We have already said that we will grade late assignments later (after Dec 9). What there hasn't been is any explicit info about is how late you can hand in late assignments.

Since we actually haven't specified it, we will allow you to upload late assignments until Dec 9. This is waay later than we would prefer, but we will allow it since this has not been explicitly specified until now.


You very late assignments won't however get high points, because:

- You have not been able to contribute to seminars with your assignment (seminar questions, seminar attendance/activity)
- There is a decrease of relevance of your very late contribution (both for us teachers reading it and for you within the framework and schedule of the course).
.

Change of date for the last lecture

.
My last lecture in the course was supposed to be held on Tuesday December 6. We also have the poster presentation on Wednesday December 7 (at 10-12) and we have the last guest lecture on Friday December 9 (at 10-12).

This last lecture of mine will be divided between 1) talking about social media and games and 2) doing a course evaluation through an interactive so-called "gripe session" (I'll explain later). It however seems like a pretty bad idea to have the course evaluation before instead of after the poster presentation, so I have moved the lecture. I checked your schedule and I just talked with my seminar group A and so the new time slot for that lecture will thus be December 7 from 13-15 in lecture hall E2. In other words; the same time and the the same place but one day later. I hope that won't cause too many problems for you!

We will thus meet twice that day (poster presentation before lunch and the lecture/gripe session directly after lunch). Do note that you get a point for attending this specific lecture of mine (same as with the guest lectures, e.g. 1 point/each).
.

Saturday, November 26, 2011

Personal reflection about your assignments

.
I have read quite a few of your assignments by now. This comment arrives so late in the course that it is of less use here, but perhaps it can be of more use later and in other contexts where you have to write texts (not the least your upcoming master's theses).

My feeling is that many, well, actually the majority of you students spend too little time thinking about what you will write and planning what you will write and that you instead just sit down and start to write something up.

It's better to spend 75% of the time planning, sketching, perhaps drawing up an outline, perhaps adding some headers and a sentence of two about what you will write about under each header - and only then spend the remaining 25% of the time producing the actual text. I get the feeling many of you spend 25% of the time, and sometimes less, thinking some about what you will write, and then too quickly sit down and try to squeeze out the required 400 - 600 - 800 - 1000 words for the assignment.

The result is that you reach the production goal (number of words), but that the text oftentimes is unfocused and difficult to follow. I often have a hard time to find a red thread or something that keeps the text together. It's rather a little about this and a little about that, a reference here, a quote there and then some opinions added. When I have finished, I'm unsure what the text actually was about, and going back to the start might not always help me to understand what The Issue you wrote about was. I instead find several smaller issues or just a string of ideas.

Beyond the concrete advice I gave above (on planning vs execution), I would suggest you pose a question somewhere in the first paragraph ("...so how does ... relate to...?", "why doesn't the music industry...?"). This will help me and you understand what the topic of your text is. You should let your eyes stray back to that question whenever you don't know what to write next in your text. It might also be a good idea to think about that question when you finish the text, perhaps add a conclusion to the question or a summary of your arguments?


I'm an experienced writer and while it's not fair to compare my texts to yours, I still encourage you to have a look at this "extended abstract" (500 words) that I submitted to a workshop only earlier this month. I can promise you that I live as I learn and did spend the vast majority of time thinking about and sketching out what I would write ("hmm, first I'll write something about ... and then..." "hmm, I need an argument that ties this and that together", "hmm, should things be said in this order or is it better to first state that..."). I only spent a little time actually writing up the final text. Do also note how much can be said in only 500 words - (the assignments for this course should be between 400 and 1000 words).
.

Wednesday, November 23, 2011

Poster review meeting feedback

.
There were a couple of interesting questions raised by specific groups that I would like to give some feedback on to all groups:

Can we change the name of our group?
- You are allowed to refine/alter/change the name of your group. You are in fact encouraged to do so if you feel that the name does not any longer reflect the work of your group.

The glossy printed poster looked great, how can our group do one?
- We will be able to print your posters. One student (studying the print specialization) has contacts and is looking in to it. Printing a poster is optional, i.e. you can but you don't have to do it. More info will follow, hopefully later this week.

- What is the status of the poster vs the paper?
Both should be able to "stand on their own legs", i.e. you should be able understand your group's core idea (basic concept) from the poster without having read the paper and vice versa.

How will the group assignment be evaluated/judged?
- Do note that criteria for evaluating the group assignment are spelled out in the document "Examination and grading" (available in Bilda).


Some students seem to be less connected to their groups (for example by not showing up at the meeting and other group members having no information about it). The KTH School of Computer Science and Communication (CSC) code of honor has a couple of things to say about group assignments and regulation 1 more specifically states:
"When working in groups each member shall contribute equally and all members shall be capable of giving account for the whole solution."

Do note that there is no final exam in the course, but that the group assignment is part of the examination (20% of the credits). We therefore want you to include a short paragraph (a few sentences at the end of your group assignment document) where you describe the division of labor in your group.
.

Guest Lecture 4 - Fri Nov 25 - Henrik, Gustaf and Wu

.
PLEASE NOTE! We will have three guests and three "mini-guest lectures" that are topically related to each other this coming Friday. Each mini-lecture will be 30 minutes long.

Guest lecturer: Henrik Åhman, Ph.D. student at KTH/Human Computer Interaction group.
Title: A war on totality: Social media from a postmodern perspective
Time: Friday November 25 at 10.15 - 10.45
Place: Lecture hall V3

Abstract:
Much has been said about the role of social media in contemporary society. On the one hand, it has been accused of having a negative impact on society by contributing to the creation of a superficial and consumerist image of human life. On the other hand, it has been argued that social media contributes to society by providing the ordinary citizen with effective information and communication tools, thereby countering the erosion of democratic institutions and contributing to the establishment of a new democratic paradigm.

By describing the development from modern to postmodern thinking, Henrik positions social media in relation to questions of diversity, knowledge, what it means to be human, and to the boundaries between the individual and society at large.

[Please take a moment to think about these issues. What do you imagine or expect Henrik to talk about? Can you in advance think of a question you would like to pose? / Daniel]


About Henrik:
Henrik is a Ph.D. student at the Human Computer Interaction Group at KTH. His research focuses on questions regarding ICT in relation to democracy and social sustainability. Henrik has a BA in Theology and a MSc in Library and Information Science.

-------------------------

Guest lecturer: Gustaf Lundström, Master's Degree Student at the Media Management Program
Title: Social media: A shortcut to democracy?
Time: Friday November 25 at 10.50-11.20
Place: Lecture hall V3

Abstract:
Blogs and Twitter, along with other social media, have been heralded as important technologies for creating a democratic exchange of information, and the connection between social media and democracy has been widely discussed in the aftermath of the past Arab spring.

But what is the real connection between liberty and social media? Should we trust the cyber-utopians in their unyielding trust of digital technologies, or are there reasons to doubt the political benefits of social media?

[Please take a moment to think about these issues. What do you imagine or expect Gustaf to talk about? Can you in advance think of a question you would like to pose? / Daniel]


Literature:
Gustaf suggests you re-read chapter 7, "Political Freedom Part 2: Emergence of the Networked Public Sphere", primarily pages 261-272.

About Gustaf:
Gustaf is currently a master's student at the KTH Media Management Master's program and has has previously studied Media Technology for three years. He wrote his Bachelor's thesis about the use of social media in marketing during the spring.

-----------------------

Guest lecturer: Wu Qi, journalist for the Southern People Weekly, China
Title: Passive Governor: Censorship in Chinese online forums
Time: Friday November 25 at 11.30-12.00
Place: Lecture hall V3 - JOINING US BY SKYPE

Abstract:
After having conducted a field study of two major Chinese online forums and 13 in-depth interviews of Chinese Internet workers/censors, Wu Qi wrote his Master's Thesis about the material and everyday practices of censoring the Internet by the people whose job it is to do it.

Wu Qi will describe how the people who actually conduct censorship and self-censorship for Chinese new media institutions perceive themselves and act accordingly on both a personal and a professional level. He will also describe the tension between regulation and self-awareness.

[Please take a moment to think about these issues. What do you imagine or expect Wu Qi to talk about? Can you in advance think of a question you would like to pose? / Daniel]


About Wu Qi:
Wu Qi is a journalist, working in Beijing for one of the leading Chinese news magazines, the Southern People Weekly. He was a visiting student at KTH in 2010 as part of an exchange program between KTH and Beijing University and he is a graduate from the School of Journalism and Communication at Beijing University.
.

Tuesday, November 22, 2011

Seminar assignment 6 (deadline Nov 27)

.
Lecture 5 (Wed Nov 23) as well as seminar assignment 5 (Mon Nov 28 and Wed Nov 30) are based on these readings.

Each assignment can be regarded as an exam question that will be graded separately. Do note that we will have no final exam or home exam in the course.

Right now, you can find the following documents in Bilda (Documents/Seminar assignments):
- The seminar 6 assignment (instructions)
- The seminar assignment template - download and use it when you write your assignment
- Three examples of good assignments written by students last year (the seminar assignment was almost identical even though the readings differed). The documents are called "Nordlund.pdf", "Ballerstedt.pdf" and "Hoglund.pdf". Read one or read all three to get inspiration and ideas of what kinds of texts are appreciated and rewarded.

Do note that instructions about how the seminar assignments will be judged/graded as well as other information about examination/grading is available in Bilda/Documents.
.

Monday, November 21, 2011

Readings for lecture 5 - Critique

.
As we all know, there is very little critique or thought about possible negative impacts of Internet/social media in Benkler's book, so this week's (relatively short) chapter in Benkler's book has been supplemented by various other heterogeneous texts. Lecture 5 (Nov 23) will cover, and for seminar 5 (Nov 28-30), the readings can be divided into four parts:

1) What is the impact of the Internet/social media on our relationships with other people and on our (mental) health? Is the Internet a "platform for human connections" or a "sad, lonely world" (or both)?

- Benkler, Chapter 10, "Social ties: Networking together". - 22 pages
- Turkle (2011), "Always on" (available in Bilda/Documents/Papers). Chapter 8 from "Alone Together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other". - 20 pages

Comment: Turkle is a well-know social psychologist who has written about computer culture and its cultural effects during the last 25 years in books such as "The second self" and "Life on the screen".


2) What is the impact of Internet/social media on our social behavior? Will people become more inhibited if commercial/governmental surveillance and data mining increases? Will participation and making your voice heard (i.e. democracy) increase or decrease?

- Lundblad (2004). "Privacy in a noise society" (pdf file). Presented at a workshop on "privacy in a networked world" - 4 (dense) pages.
- Morozov (2010). "Iran: Downside to the 'Twitter revolution" (available in Bilda/Documents/Papers). Published in Dissent, Vol.56, No.4 (fall 2009), pp.9-14 - 4 pages
(- Also warmly recommended, eminently readable but optional; Gladwell, "Small change: Why the revolution will not be tweeted". The New Yorker Oct. 4. 2010)

Comment: Lundblad is now director of Public Policy at Google. The topic of his short paper above was extended and developed in Lundblad's Ph.D. thesis "Law in a noise society". Morozov is a well-known critic of hyped-up social networking tools in the context of (Arabian and other) revolutions and democracy movements, and his argument was extended in his 2011 book "The net delusion: The dark side of Internet freedom". Gladwell is a well-known journalist and author of books such as "The tipping point", "Blink" and "Outliers".


3) What is the impact of Internet/social media on our thinking? Is Google "making us stupid"? Are we more well-informed than ever, but less able to think deep, complex thoughts?

- Postman (1990)."Informing ourselves to death" (transcribed speech given at a computer conference) - 8 pages.
- Carr (2008). "Is Google making us stupid?" Atlantic monthly - 7 pages.

Comment: Postman's paper later became a chapter his book "Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology". Carr's text later became part of his 2010 book "The Shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brains"


4) Perhaps most provocative of all questions; is the Internet/social media sustainable in the long run? Will we face challenges during the 21st century (climate change, energy and resource depletion issues) that will force us to radically rethink our habits and our use of technology? These short texts point out some radically different possibilities for the future of cheap electricity and for the Internet/social media.

- Bardi (2009). "The spike and the peak" (pdf file). Posted to online discussion forum "The Oil Drum" - 4 pages.
- Pargman (2010). "Ubiquitous information in a world of limitations" (available in Bilda/Documents/Papers). Presented at a 2010 workshop on "The culture of ubiquitous information". - 16 pages.
- Greer (2009). "The end of the information age" and "The economics of decline" (printer-friendly version). Published at Energy Bulletin - 3 pages each.

Comments: My text above is also the basis for a proposed master's thesis topic, "ICT use in the post-modern city". Greer's texts draws on his 2008 book "The long descent: A user's guide to the end of the industrial age". Greer makes a passing remark to the short 1909 story "The machine stops" by the author E.M. Forster (more well-know for "A room with a view" and "Howard's end"). You might consider reading a little fiction in you get tired of all the fact-filled texts above...

Part 1 (22 + 20) + part 2 (8 pages) + part 3 (15 pages) + part 4 (26 pages) = 90 pages.
.

Sunday, November 20, 2011

Date for poster presentation is Dec 7 before lunch

.
So, the results of the votes are in. Even though less than 50% voted (= questionable legitimacy in a democratic society :-), the preferred date of those who did vote is:

Wednesday December 7 between 10-12 at "Torget" (house D, top floor)

You should hang up your posters one day in advance, i.e. on Tuesday December 7. I will give my last lecture in the course that day (13-15) and you should thus hang you poster before then.

I will send out invitations to colleagues (teachers and ph.d. students on the same floor) to go have a look at your posters. I might ask them to give me feedback about their favorites posters.

I met all the groups except one for a review meeting in the end of last week (Wed-Fri). I will write a separate blog post about it, but will mention just one thing here. You all saw the great-looking printed poster from last year. One student (M.H.) had some leads about where all groups (who want to) can print equally great-looking posters. It seems it might not be too expensive, and the course can then pick up the tab and pay for these costs. More info to follow.
.

Thursday, November 17, 2011

Guest Lecture 3 - Fri Nov 18 - Pernilla Josefsson


Guest lecturer:
Pernilla Josefsson, PhD student at Media Technology, KTH
Title: E-learning
Time:
Friday 18 of December at 10:00-12:00
Lecture hall: Lecture hall D2

Abstract:


About Pernilla:
Pernilla is a Ph.D. candidate at KTH Media technology. Her background is in (Media-) Informatics.

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

We need better links!

.
When I summarized your seminar questions Sunday night, I was struck by the fact that less than half of your questions could easily be related to the specific readings for the week (about links and social networks). The other half, while still relating to social media, didn't have that much to do with what you were to read in order to write your assignment and to prepare for the seminar. Also, I have in my two seminar groups allowed student seminar questions and the whole discussions to wander pretty much all over the place.

Only after my last seminar (yesterday) did I realize this, and so me and Pernilla have conferred and would like to clarify some guidelines for the three remaining assignments and seminars:

1) Your assignment can make use of course literature in general, but you should make an effort to more specifically make use of this week's readings when you write you assignment.
Comment: Each assignment corresponds to a question on an exam. You can't write about whatever on an exam (no matter how insightful), but should stick to the question. You shouldn't write whatever on an assignment, but should make sure you utilize this week's readings and this week's topics.

2) Your seminar question should be displayed prominently on your cover page and it is strongly recommended that it relates to your assignment in some way (thereby also relating to this week's readings).

3) The seminar discussions will (through you following instructions 1 and 2 above) by default to a higher degree concern this week's readings, and me and Pernilla will also make an effort to steer the discussions in this direction. The seminars will not just be about ventilating opinions about whatever-that-is-related-to-social-media, but should also be a way to engage with, discuss, criticize and make use of the course literature.

4) It is a plus if the group assignment and your posters in some way relate to or make use of the course literature. If you get ideas from the readings that you manage to connect to and relate to your group assignment (could be in the companion document, doesn't have to be on the poster itself), that is commendable and will impress us when we judge and grade the group assignment.
.

Date for group assignment/poster presentation in Dec

.
We need to decide on exactly when to present the group assignment/posters. We need a two-hour session. It should be sometime during the last week of the course, i.e. week 49 (three weeks from now). We have lectures and seminars on Monday, Tuesday and Friday so Wednesday and Thursday are our best options.

I have four suggestions for possible time slots and it is up to you all to select which one(s) are most suitable for your. Go to this Doodle page and vote for your favorite time slots. You can choose several and we will choose the one that is most popular.

More specifically, I will book the open space "Torget" (house D, top floor). There are screens there where you can hang your posters and you should hang then up 24 hours before the presentation. I will invite my colleagues on the top floor to go and have a look at your posters and to listen to your presentations.
.

Don't forget the podcast!

.

Only 1/4 of the class have downloaded the custom-made 20 minute long podcast about social media and about this course. Even fewer have actually answered the follow-up questionnaire (with 7 questions).

The students who did the podcast have gotten in touch and asked me to remind you about:
- The podcast (can be downloaded from Bilda/Documents)
- The questionnaire (available at http://tinyurl.com/DM2578-podcast)

It would be of great help to them if you could do these two things, and, listening to the podcast is supposed to be fun and informative so this is not an arduous or difficult task!
.